Session 2: Culture and Community
The session focused on debates, which started in the 1980s
and maybe a bit earlier on certain dominant ideas of culture. These debates were
a response to how North American anthropology in particular defined or even
used culture as a category. Such an understanding of culture as a stable
discrete entity or ‘ways of life of a particular group of people’ can be traced
to Franz Boas. He in turn borrowed from
the German philosophers Herder and Klum who argued that individuals are part of
society (and so defined by their culture).
The 1986 volume Writing Culture provoked further debates in anthropology on
ethnography and ethnographic knowledge. The rise of feminist thought, sub-cultures
and multiculturalism as epitomised by the readings began to destabilise the
idea of culture as a long lasting stable entity. Each of the readings question
this hegemonic understanding of culture through different lenses – Lughod links it
to the feminist movement, Gupta & Ferguson question the notion of culture
as tied to a particular territory or place, Appadurai questions culture in the
context of globalisation, Taylor uses multiculturalism as his entry point.
The pieces mark an interesting moment when anthropologists
were attempting to look at other analytical frameworks like discourses, practices,
ideology instead of culture. However around the same time politics of identity
start coming to the fore – community groups start articulating claims of
belonging to discrete cultures that are different / unique compared to the
cultures of other groups or even sub-groups. In this context certain classic
texts like Durkheim are useful to understand the persistence of culture as a
concept that defines a community or group.
Krupa & Rashmi
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.